
Instead of the regular web encyclopedias that try to maintain a neutral voice and stance, or develop their content for a specific audience, Standpedia is a little different. It begins with an issue, usually posed as a question. Users are then able to add “stands” to this issue, positive, negative, neutral. Each of these stands can be challenged, defended, or added to. There is also the ability to add supporting sites and media as background information. An interesting casual chain of thought. Public and collaborative brainstorming?
The cool part about this site is the display. I’m a sucker for eye candy. Each issue is displayed in the form of a map tree, and each stand on the issue has equal footing. I have one criticism for this map. There are not features to zoom in/out at will. Some of the more complex maps can stretch several screen-widths horizontally and vertically. You can mouse-drag to navigate within the map, but I keep wanting to zoom out, then choose where I want to zoom in. The squiggly lined arrows indicate a “challenge” to the statement to which it is pointing.

The information included in the map is very simple, usually a few words or short sentence and no more. I see this as a place to get ideas or gain perspective on touchy subjects–aside from the reference resources, I would not use this as a legitimate research resource.
Email This Post to a Friend








The explosion of available reviews for everything from 
Latest Comments